<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1105 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442126</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment on sales to associated enterprises was remanded because the segmental accounts and benchmarking method had been rejected without first examining whether the allocations were prepared on a just and reasonable basis. Intra-group management, SAP, Opti-mill and business area service es were held allowable under section 37(1) once the transactions had been accepted at arm&#039;s length; the assessing authority could not apply a separate benefit test contrary to commercial expediency. Reimbursement of bank guarantee commission was not a prior period expense because the invoices were raised in the relevant year, while the tax deduction at source objection was sent back for fresh consideration under the applicable treaty arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 08:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1105 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442126</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment on sales to associated enterprises was remanded because the segmental accounts and benchmarking method had been rejected without first examining whether the allocations were prepared on a just and reasonable basis. Intra-group management, SAP, Opti-mill and business area service es were held allowable under section 37(1) once the transactions had been accepted at arm&#039;s length; the assessing authority could not apply a separate benefit test contrary to commercial expediency. Reimbursement of bank guarantee commission was not a prior period expense because the invoices were raised in the relevant year, while the tax deduction at source objection was sent back for fresh consideration under the applicable treaty arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>