<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1567 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309329</link>
    <description>A written family arrangement that effectively relinquishes rights in immovable property was treated as requiring registration and proper stamping; on the facts, it was not accepted as a valid family arrangement and the coercion and undue influence objections were upheld in substance. The court also held that the &#039;B&#039; schedule property, and other estate-derived properties, remained liable to partition among the heirs, while the benami objection failed because the transaction fell within the fiduciary exception. A partition suit based on co-heirship and trust did not require prior cancellation of the sale deed. Limitation and the succession-law bar were rejected, and the will was accepted as duly proved, so probate was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1567 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309329</link>
      <description>A written family arrangement that effectively relinquishes rights in immovable property was treated as requiring registration and proper stamping; on the facts, it was not accepted as a valid family arrangement and the coercion and undue influence objections were upheld in substance. The court also held that the &#039;B&#039; schedule property, and other estate-derived properties, remained liable to partition among the heirs, while the benami objection failed because the transaction fell within the fiduciary exception. A partition suit based on co-heirship and trust did not require prior cancellation of the sale deed. Limitation and the succession-law bar were rejected, and the will was accepted as duly proved, so probate was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>