<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 267 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33729</link>
    <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit for disputed interest was declined where the appellant alleged an arithmetical error in the quantified demand but did not plead financial hardship. The Tribunal restored the appeal on COD clearance, but granted only partial interim relief by directing a substantial pre-deposit of Rs. 80 lakhs and waiving the balance during the pendency of the appeal, subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 267 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33729</link>
      <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit for disputed interest was declined where the appellant alleged an arithmetical error in the quantified demand but did not plead financial hardship. The Tribunal restored the appeal on COD clearance, but granted only partial interim relief by directing a substantial pre-deposit of Rs. 80 lakhs and waiving the balance during the pendency of the appeal, subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>