<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 157 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33728</link>
    <description>The stay petition against penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was granted, dispensing with the pre-deposit of penalties pending appeal. The appeal dismissed as time-barred by the Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have been filed within the prescribed time limit but in the wrong office, leading to a remand for a decision on merits after proper consideration. The appellants were granted the opportunity for a fair hearing on the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 157 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33728</link>
      <description>The stay petition against penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was granted, dispensing with the pre-deposit of penalties pending appeal. The appeal dismissed as time-barred by the Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have been filed within the prescribed time limit but in the wrong office, leading to a remand for a decision on merits after proper consideration. The appellants were granted the opportunity for a fair hearing on the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>