<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 698 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309321</link>
    <description>The impugned orders rejecting the refund claim were set aside, and the case was remanded to the original authority for reconsideration of the refund claim on its merits, including the question of reassessment under a different classification. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, providing a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 14:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 698 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309321</link>
      <description>The impugned orders rejecting the refund claim were set aside, and the case was remanded to the original authority for reconsideration of the refund claim on its merits, including the question of reassessment under a different classification. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, providing a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>