https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309313 Family pedigree evidence is admissible where a witness speaks from independent family knowledge and not mere hearsay, and duly proved Panjikar entries made in the ordinary course may corroborate such testimony; on those principles, the plaintiffs' reversionary title was established. A widow was entitled to enjoy the income of her husband's estate and was not required to preserve savings for reversioners, but whether property acquired from those savings accreted to the husband's estate depended on intention. Because the widow's dedication of the Schedule III properties to family deities showed an intention to keep them separate, those properties remained her separate property and were not available to the reversioners. en-us Wed, 21 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309313 Family pedigree evidence is admissible where a witness speaks from independent family knowledge and not mere hearsay, and duly proved Panjikar entries made in the ordinary course may corroborate such testimony; on those principles, the plaintiffs' reversionary title was established. A widow was entitled to enjoy the income of her husband's estate and was not required to preserve savings for reversioners, but whether property acquired from those savings accreted to the husband's estate depended on intention. Because the widow's dedication of the Schedule III properties to family deities showed an intention to keep them separate, those properties remained her separate property and were not available to the reversioners. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309313