https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33725 The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument that certain headings were not chargeable under the category of "Consulting Engineer." As the PSU unit had already pre-deposited a substantial amount, the Tribunal granted a waiver of the balance duty and penalty amounts, staying their recovery until the appeal's disposal. The appeal was scheduled for a hearing on 19th November 2008, emphasizing the significance of accurate service categorization for tax purposes and the Tribunal's authority to grant waivers based on the case's prima facie merits. en-us Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33725 The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument that certain headings were not chargeable under the category of "Consulting Engineer." As the PSU unit had already pre-deposited a substantial amount, the Tribunal granted a waiver of the balance duty and penalty amounts, staying their recovery until the appeal's disposal. The appeal was scheduled for a hearing on 19th November 2008, emphasizing the significance of accurate service categorization for tax purposes and the Tribunal's authority to grant waivers based on the case's prima facie merits. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33725