<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1089 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442110</link>
    <description>SC examined a GST audit challenge by a partnership firm seeking to close its business without paying collected tax. The court quashed the audit notice under Section 65 of CGST Act, finding the sudden audit inconsistent with periodic audit provisions. While permitting assessment proceedings under Sections 73 and 74, the court invalidated the impugned audit order, effectively allowing the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1089 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442110</link>
      <description>SC examined a GST audit challenge by a partnership firm seeking to close its business without paying collected tax. The court quashed the audit notice under Section 65 of CGST Act, finding the sudden audit inconsistent with periodic audit provisions. While permitting assessment proceedings under Sections 73 and 74, the court invalidated the impugned audit order, effectively allowing the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>