<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1088 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442109</link>
    <description>SC remanded the case involving a textiles unit&#039;s GST input tax credit dispute. The court set aside the original order due to lack of hearing opportunity, directing the respondent to issue a fresh notice. The petitioner was required to deposit Rs. 50,000 as security and the respondent must dispose of the case within 30 days, with the deposited amount subject to final adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1088 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442109</link>
      <description>SC remanded the case involving a textiles unit&#039;s GST input tax credit dispute. The court set aside the original order due to lack of hearing opportunity, directing the respondent to issue a fresh notice. The petitioner was required to deposit Rs. 50,000 as security and the respondent must dispose of the case within 30 days, with the deposited amount subject to final adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>