<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1075 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442096</link>
    <description>The Court declined admission to the appeal and dismissed it as the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer was based on factual findings from other assessment years, indicating no evidence of evasion or suppression. The Tribunal concluded that the additions were presumptive and lacked concrete proof, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:09:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1075 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442096</link>
      <description>The Court declined admission to the appeal and dismissed it as the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer was based on factual findings from other assessment years, indicating no evidence of evasion or suppression. The Tribunal concluded that the additions were presumptive and lacked concrete proof, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>