<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1073 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442094</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the assessment order issued under the Faceless Assessment Scheme, granting the petitioner another opportunity to provide requested details and allowing for a personal hearing. The petitioner&#039;s claim of insufficient opportunity was upheld, emphasizing the need for effective chances to respond. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, with directions for the petitioner to reply within two weeks and avail a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1073 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442094</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the assessment order issued under the Faceless Assessment Scheme, granting the petitioner another opportunity to provide requested details and allowing for a personal hearing. The petitioner&#039;s claim of insufficient opportunity was upheld, emphasizing the need for effective chances to respond. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, with directions for the petitioner to reply within two weeks and avail a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>