<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1050 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442071</link>
    <description>The court quashed three show cause notices due to unjustifiable delay in adjudication, finding the delay not attributable to the Petitioner. Emphasizing compliance with statutory timelines, the court highlighted the prejudice caused by delays, stressing the importance of timely adjudication to uphold legal rights. The court concluded that the delay amounted to denial of fairness and lawful adjudication, ruling in favor of the Petitioner without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:08:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1050 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442071</link>
      <description>The court quashed three show cause notices due to unjustifiable delay in adjudication, finding the delay not attributable to the Petitioner. Emphasizing compliance with statutory timelines, the court highlighted the prejudice caused by delays, stressing the importance of timely adjudication to uphold legal rights. The court concluded that the delay amounted to denial of fairness and lawful adjudication, ruling in favor of the Petitioner without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>