<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1049 - CESTAT NEW DELHI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax for the period from 01.05.2011 to 31.03.2015, along with penalties under Sections 77(1)(a), 77(2), and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to prove the removal of air-conditioning facilities and was found to have intentions to evade tax liability, justifying the extended period of limitation and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1049 - CESTAT NEW DELHI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax for the period from 01.05.2011 to 31.03.2015, along with penalties under Sections 77(1)(a), 77(2), and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to prove the removal of air-conditioning facilities and was found to have intentions to evade tax liability, justifying the extended period of limitation and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>