<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1045 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442066</link>
    <description>The appellant, a holder of service tax registration, received invoices from a Texas company for salaries and benefits of personnel, leading to the belief that manpower supply services were received. The original authority confirmed the demands for service tax, penalties, and interest. The Tribunal remanded the matter for redetermination following a relevant Supreme Court ruling. Penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside by the Tribunal, directing a reassessment based on the Supreme Court ruling. The case was remanded to the original authority for reevaluation of service tax liability, interest, and penalties in light of the Supreme Court ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:08:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1045 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442066</link>
      <description>The appellant, a holder of service tax registration, received invoices from a Texas company for salaries and benefits of personnel, leading to the belief that manpower supply services were received. The original authority confirmed the demands for service tax, penalties, and interest. The Tribunal remanded the matter for redetermination following a relevant Supreme Court ruling. Penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside by the Tribunal, directing a reassessment based on the Supreme Court ruling. The case was remanded to the original authority for reevaluation of service tax liability, interest, and penalties in light of the Supreme Court ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>