https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309312 The Tribunal intervened due to the Principal Commissioner's non-compliance with the order for refund and consequential relief, leading to a delay. A direction was given for immediate payout at 6% interest for undue retention of deposits. The Principal Commissioner's reluctance to accept the Tribunal's decisions raised concerns about accountability. The Tribunal adjourned the matter for further submissions and recommended notifying higher authorities to ensure compliance with judicial determinations and legal obligations. The judgment emphasized the importance of adherence to Tribunal orders and the need for punitive measures to enforce compliance by tax authorities. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:29:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309312 The Tribunal intervened due to the Principal Commissioner's non-compliance with the order for refund and consequential relief, leading to a delay. A direction was given for immediate payout at 6% interest for undue retention of deposits. The Principal Commissioner's reluctance to accept the Tribunal's decisions raised concerns about accountability. The Tribunal adjourned the matter for further submissions and recommended notifying higher authorities to ensure compliance with judicial determinations and legal obligations. The judgment emphasized the importance of adherence to Tribunal orders and the need for punitive measures to enforce compliance by tax authorities. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309312