<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1034 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442055</link>
    <description>The HC partially allowed the writ appeal challenging a garnishee notice for service tax recovery. The court modified the previous order, permitting the appellant to operate their bank account beyond the demanded amount. The decision addressed issues of notice service and bank account attachment, providing relief to the appellant while maintaining the underlying tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1034 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442055</link>
      <description>The HC partially allowed the writ appeal challenging a garnishee notice for service tax recovery. The court modified the previous order, permitting the appellant to operate their bank account beyond the demanded amount. The decision addressed issues of notice service and bank account attachment, providing relief to the appellant while maintaining the underlying tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>