<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1031 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442052</link>
    <description>Ruling on profiteering allegations in real estate projects, the Competition Commission of India reviewed the Director General of Anti-Profiteering&#039;s report. After investigating multiple projects, no profiteering was found beyond the initial case. The Commission dropped proceedings under CGST Act, 2017, confirming no violation in subsequent projects and closing the case file.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1031 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442052</link>
      <description>Ruling on profiteering allegations in real estate projects, the Competition Commission of India reviewed the Director General of Anti-Profiteering&#039;s report. After investigating multiple projects, no profiteering was found beyond the initial case. The Commission dropped proceedings under CGST Act, 2017, confirming no violation in subsequent projects and closing the case file.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>