<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1005 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442026</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner on all issues. It declared the freezing of the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts illegal, ordered the unsealing of the godown premises, and revoked the detention of goods and documents. The court emphasized that the respondents&#039; actions were without jurisdiction and authority of law, directing the return of detained materials and defreezing of bank accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1005 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442026</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner on all issues. It declared the freezing of the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts illegal, ordered the unsealing of the godown premises, and revoked the detention of goods and documents. The court emphasized that the respondents&#039; actions were without jurisdiction and authority of law, directing the return of detained materials and defreezing of bank accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>