https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442025 The Tribunal found that the respondent did not violate the conditions of the notification by registering the vehicle as a tourist vehicle within the allowed timeframe. The earnings used to fulfill the export obligation were deemed acceptable, even if not solely from the imported car. The Customs department cannot question the EODC issued by JDGFT without prior consultation. The Customs department's appeal was dismissed, confirming that the demand for differential duty and penalties was not sustainable. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:06:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442025 The Tribunal found that the respondent did not violate the conditions of the notification by registering the vehicle as a tourist vehicle within the allowed timeframe. The earnings used to fulfill the export obligation were deemed acceptable, even if not solely from the imported car. The Customs department cannot question the EODC issued by JDGFT without prior consultation. The Customs department's appeal was dismissed, confirming that the demand for differential duty and penalties was not sustainable. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442025