<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 266 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33710</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving the interpretation of Central Excise Notifications on the exemption of excisable goods from Additional Duty of Customs. The dispute arose when a 100% EOU cleared goods without paying additional customs duty equal to Basic Excise Duty. Relying on established judicial precedents, including Supreme Court decisions, the Tribunal concluded that if goods are exempt from Central Excise duty, Additional Duty of Customs is not applicable. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s appeal against the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant, aligning with the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation and legal reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 266 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33710</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving the interpretation of Central Excise Notifications on the exemption of excisable goods from Additional Duty of Customs. The dispute arose when a 100% EOU cleared goods without paying additional customs duty equal to Basic Excise Duty. Relying on established judicial precedents, including Supreme Court decisions, the Tribunal concluded that if goods are exempt from Central Excise duty, Additional Duty of Customs is not applicable. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s appeal against the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant, aligning with the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation and legal reasoning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>