<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 997 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442018</link>
    <description>A later-imposed service tax under lease deeds could be recovered from the lessee where the contractual language covered property-related outgoings and did not exclude future statutory levies, and where the statutory scheme permitted the tax burden to be passed on from the service provider to the recipient. The lessor was therefore entitled to recover the tax from the service recipient. On interest, pendente lite interest was confined to the period after institution of the suit, so no interest was allowed for any earlier period; compensation for wrongful retention of money was awarded only from the date of filing until payment at the rate considered appropriate on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 997 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442018</link>
      <description>A later-imposed service tax under lease deeds could be recovered from the lessee where the contractual language covered property-related outgoings and did not exclude future statutory levies, and where the statutory scheme permitted the tax burden to be passed on from the service provider to the recipient. The lessor was therefore entitled to recover the tax from the service recipient. On interest, pendente lite interest was confined to the period after institution of the suit, so no interest was allowed for any earlier period; compensation for wrongful retention of money was awarded only from the date of filing until payment at the rate considered appropriate on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>