<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1429 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration due to the incorrect application of Rule 8D(2) of the Rules. Regarding the disallowance of depreciation claimed by the assessee, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, granting the assessee the right to claim depreciation at a higher rate for specified assets based on relevant High Court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 22:31:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1429 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration due to the incorrect application of Rule 8D(2) of the Rules. Regarding the disallowance of depreciation claimed by the assessee, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, granting the assessee the right to claim depreciation at a higher rate for specified assets based on relevant High Court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>