<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1421 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309299</link>
    <description>The court exercised discretion and condoned the delay in filing the appeal despite an unsatisfactory explanation, emphasizing the need to examine substantial questions of law. The court dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, ruling that no substantial question of law arose for consideration as the tribunal had thoroughly examined the matter and decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 22:31:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1421 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309299</link>
      <description>The court exercised discretion and condoned the delay in filing the appeal despite an unsatisfactory explanation, emphasizing the need to examine substantial questions of law. The court dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, ruling that no substantial question of law arose for consideration as the tribunal had thoroughly examined the matter and decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>