<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1390 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309298</link>
    <description>The court upheld the lower courts&#039; judgments, finding the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The revision application was dismissed, and the rule discharged, emphasizing the significance of statutory presumptions under the Act in ensuring the effectiveness of the legal framework governing negotiable instruments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 22:31:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1390 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309298</link>
      <description>The court upheld the lower courts&#039; judgments, finding the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The revision application was dismissed, and the rule discharged, emphasizing the significance of statutory presumptions under the Act in ensuring the effectiveness of the legal framework governing negotiable instruments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>