<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 406 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309292</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order passed by Mr. Justice Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee was declared void and without effect due to lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized the Chief Justice&#039;s authority in assigning judicial business and the necessity of proper jurisdiction for judicial orders. Respondents were granted liberty to seek relief from the appropriate Bench. Any interim relief granted was vacated, and the application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 406 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309292</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order passed by Mr. Justice Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee was declared void and without effect due to lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized the Chief Justice&#039;s authority in assigning judicial business and the necessity of proper jurisdiction for judicial orders. Respondents were granted liberty to seek relief from the appropriate Bench. Any interim relief granted was vacated, and the application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>