https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309290 The court clarified that admitting a signature on a cheque does not equate to admitting execution, allowing the accused to challenge other entries' authenticity. The accused's request to send the cheque to an expert for comparison was denied initially, but the court directed a fresh application specifying the comparison needed. If the handwriting comparison request is made, the cheque will be sent for analysis. The judgment emphasized potential compensation for the complainant if found guilty, including interest payment on the cheque amount if successful. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:41:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309290 The court clarified that admitting a signature on a cheque does not equate to admitting execution, allowing the accused to challenge other entries' authenticity. The accused's request to send the cheque to an expert for comparison was denied initially, but the court directed a fresh application specifying the comparison needed. If the handwriting comparison request is made, the cheque will be sent for analysis. The judgment emphasized potential compensation for the complainant if found guilty, including interest payment on the cheque amount if successful. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309290