https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441999 HC set aside the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. It held that the impugned order dated 13.10.2022 was unsustainable as it neither referred to nor considered the petitioner's reply and explanation. The court noted that the business premises had been demolished by Northern Railway, and there was no material to contradict the petitioner's assertion that demolition occurred in 2021, compelling a shift to a new address. As the show cause notices lacked adequate basis and consideration, both they and the consequential orders were quashed, and the petition allowed. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441999 HC set aside the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. It held that the impugned order dated 13.10.2022 was unsustainable as it neither referred to nor considered the petitioner's reply and explanation. The court noted that the business premises had been demolished by Northern Railway, and there was no material to contradict the petitioner's assertion that demolition occurred in 2021, compelling a shift to a new address. As the show cause notices lacked adequate basis and consideration, both they and the consequential orders were quashed, and the petition allowed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441999