https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441994 Contested questions of fact, including the nature of the product and the need for sample testing, were treated as matters better resolved by the statutory authorities rather than in writ jurisdiction. The availability of an appellate remedy under the GST framework, together with the fact that the writ was filed within the appeal limitation period, supported relegating the petitioner to that remedy. Liberty was preserved to seek sample testing before the appellate authority, and the writ petition was disposed of without adjudication on the merits of the compensation cess demand. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441994 Contested questions of fact, including the nature of the product and the need for sample testing, were treated as matters better resolved by the statutory authorities rather than in writ jurisdiction. The availability of an appellate remedy under the GST framework, together with the fact that the writ was filed within the appeal limitation period, supported relegating the petitioner to that remedy. Liberty was preserved to seek sample testing before the appellate authority, and the writ petition was disposed of without adjudication on the merits of the compensation cess demand. Case-Laws GST Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441994