<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 971 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441992</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of an appeal filed beyond the statutory limitation under the TNGST Act, 2017. Despite the significant delay, the court directed the first respondent to hear the appeal on merits within four weeks, providing the petitioner an opportunity to present their case, effectively condoning the procedural delay and balancing the interests of both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 971 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441992</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of an appeal filed beyond the statutory limitation under the TNGST Act, 2017. Despite the significant delay, the court directed the first respondent to hear the appeal on merits within four weeks, providing the petitioner an opportunity to present their case, effectively condoning the procedural delay and balancing the interests of both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>