<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 968 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441989</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging notices issued under sections 148A(b) and subsequent orders for income escapement assessment. The petitioners alleged lack of due process in issuing the notices. The Court found the information provided was adequate for the petitioners to respond effectively, rejecting claims of insufficient opportunity to be heard. Both petitions were dismissed, allowing parties to seek remedies under section 148 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 968 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441989</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging notices issued under sections 148A(b) and subsequent orders for income escapement assessment. The petitioners alleged lack of due process in issuing the notices. The Court found the information provided was adequate for the petitioners to respond effectively, rejecting claims of insufficient opportunity to be heard. Both petitions were dismissed, allowing parties to seek remedies under section 148 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>