<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 960 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441981</link>
    <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal concluded that the appellant had a reasonable cause for not getting the accounts audited, considering factors such as ignorance of tax provisions, bona fide belief, technical nature of the mistake, and lack of intentional wrongdoing. The appeal was allowed, and the decision was rendered on 18/08/2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:11:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 960 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441981</link>
      <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal concluded that the appellant had a reasonable cause for not getting the accounts audited, considering factors such as ignorance of tax provisions, bona fide belief, technical nature of the mistake, and lack of intentional wrongdoing. The appeal was allowed, and the decision was rendered on 18/08/2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>