<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 952 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441973</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to modify the exemption order to make it effective from 1st April 2020, agreeing with the petitioner that Circular No. 2/2021-Customs should not apply retrospectively. The court held that the petitioner&#039;s application should be considered under Circular No. 13/2009-Customs, which was in effect when the application was made. The petition was allowed, and the exemption was granted from the requested date, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2024 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 952 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441973</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to modify the exemption order to make it effective from 1st April 2020, agreeing with the petitioner that Circular No. 2/2021-Customs should not apply retrospectively. The court held that the petitioner&#039;s application should be considered under Circular No. 13/2009-Customs, which was in effect when the application was made. The petition was allowed, and the exemption was granted from the requested date, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>