<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 946 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of machine tools, regarding the valuation of imported goods under ATA Carnet for exhibition purposes. The Tribunal emphasized that the transaction value under the Customs Act should be the price actually paid or payable for the goods, accepting the appellant&#039;s negotiated price of EU 30000 over the ATA Carnet value of EU 55900. The Tribunal set aside the Revenue Department&#039;s rejection of the negotiated transaction value, highlighting the importance of accepting negotiated prices unless valid reasons for rejection are provided, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 946 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of machine tools, regarding the valuation of imported goods under ATA Carnet for exhibition purposes. The Tribunal emphasized that the transaction value under the Customs Act should be the price actually paid or payable for the goods, accepting the appellant&#039;s negotiated price of EU 30000 over the ATA Carnet value of EU 55900. The Tribunal set aside the Revenue Department&#039;s rejection of the negotiated transaction value, highlighting the importance of accepting negotiated prices unless valid reasons for rejection are provided, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>