<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 936 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441957</link>
    <description>Refilling liquid oxygen and liquid argon from bulk containers into retail cylinders, with labeling and conversion from liquid to gaseous form, is stated not to amount to manufacture under Chapter Note 9 to Chapter 28 read with section 2(f) because mere transfer between containers and identification labeling do not create a new marketable product or a product having a distinct character. The note applies only where the process brings about marketability in the statutory sense. It also states that the extended limitation period is unavailable where the dispute is interpretational and there is no proved suppression, fraud, collusion, or wilful misstatement; on that basis, demand, penalty, and confiscation could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 936 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441957</link>
      <description>Refilling liquid oxygen and liquid argon from bulk containers into retail cylinders, with labeling and conversion from liquid to gaseous form, is stated not to amount to manufacture under Chapter Note 9 to Chapter 28 read with section 2(f) because mere transfer between containers and identification labeling do not create a new marketable product or a product having a distinct character. The note applies only where the process brings about marketability in the statutory sense. It also states that the extended limitation period is unavailable where the dispute is interpretational and there is no proved suppression, fraud, collusion, or wilful misstatement; on that basis, demand, penalty, and confiscation could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>