<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1927 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309271</link>
    <description>An objection that an arbitral award is without jurisdiction may be raised in execution under Section 47 CPC when the defect is patent on the record and no fresh factual inquiry is needed. Because Section 36(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 treats the award as enforceable like a decree, execution proceeds under the CPC, and the restriction on late jurisdictional objections in Section 34 does not bar such a challenge. On the facts, the arbitration clause and reference applied only to the company, with no agreement or basis to fasten liability on the directors; the objection succeeded and execution against them was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 22:13:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1927 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309271</link>
      <description>An objection that an arbitral award is without jurisdiction may be raised in execution under Section 47 CPC when the defect is patent on the record and no fresh factual inquiry is needed. Because Section 36(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 treats the award as enforceable like a decree, execution proceeds under the CPC, and the restriction on late jurisdictional objections in Section 34 does not bar such a challenge. On the facts, the arbitration clause and reference applied only to the company, with no agreement or basis to fasten liability on the directors; the objection succeeded and execution against them was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>