<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 286 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33696</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the company failed to prove a direct nexus between the conditional donations made to secure college admissions and its business interests. The court held that the payments did not qualify as deductible business expenses under the claimed category of &quot;staff welfare expenses.&quot; The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 286 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33696</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the company failed to prove a direct nexus between the conditional donations made to secure college admissions and its business interests. The court held that the payments did not qualify as deductible business expenses under the claimed category of &quot;staff welfare expenses.&quot; The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>