https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309275 The court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to justify a significant delay of almost ten years in filing the appeal. Despite claiming non-receipt of the order and lack of information from their counsel, the court held the appellant responsible for vigilance over their rights. The court emphasized the need for valid reasons for condonation of delay, highlighting that waiting for information for almost a decade was unjustifiable. The appellant's arguments regarding non-delivery of the order were refuted by the department's evidence, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs awarded. en-us Sun, 13 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2023 22:13:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309275 The court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to justify a significant delay of almost ten years in filing the appeal. Despite claiming non-receipt of the order and lack of information from their counsel, the court held the appellant responsible for vigilance over their rights. The court emphasized the need for valid reasons for condonation of delay, highlighting that waiting for information for almost a decade was unjustifiable. The appellant's arguments regarding non-delivery of the order were refuted by the department's evidence, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Sun, 13 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309275