<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 156 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The judgment focused on the classification of imported goods as limestone or marble, duty liability, and the validity of the DEEC licence. The Tribunal found that the GSI report did not conclusively determine the goods&#039; classification under the relevant Tariff sub-heading, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 156 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The judgment focused on the classification of imported goods as limestone or marble, duty liability, and the validity of the DEEC licence. The Tribunal found that the GSI report did not conclusively determine the goods&#039; classification under the relevant Tariff sub-heading, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>