https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309255 An arbitral award that was not challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 attains finality and is enforceable as a decree under Section 36; objections that the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction or that the award is inexecutable cannot be raised in execution, and the executing court cannot go behind the award. The challenge to execution therefore failed. However, where the award covered only the licensed portion of an industrial shed, the plaintiff retained a separate claim to the remaining portion not covered by the licence deed or award, and interim protection could still be granted for that distinct area because possession and title remained in dispute. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309255 An arbitral award that was not challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 attains finality and is enforceable as a decree under Section 36; objections that the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction or that the award is inexecutable cannot be raised in execution, and the executing court cannot go behind the award. The challenge to execution therefore failed. However, where the award covered only the licensed portion of an industrial shed, the plaintiff retained a separate claim to the remaining portion not covered by the licence deed or award, and interim protection could still be granted for that distinct area because possession and title remained in dispute. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309255