https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309252 An executing court may resist enforcement of an arbitral award, even after merger into a decree, where the award is shown to be perverse, unsupported by evidence or material, or tainted by legal misconduct. The court may examine the underlying arbitral record to see whether the arbitrator had cogent claims, reference material, accounts, or documentary foundation for fastening liability. On the facts, the award was found to rest on no identifiable claims or intelligible basis, and the memorandum of understanding did not cure the defect. Execution was therefore refused and the execution application dismissed. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2023 12:57:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309252 An executing court may resist enforcement of an arbitral award, even after merger into a decree, where the award is shown to be perverse, unsupported by evidence or material, or tainted by legal misconduct. The court may examine the underlying arbitral record to see whether the arbitrator had cogent claims, reference material, accounts, or documentary foundation for fastening liability. On the facts, the award was found to rest on no identifiable claims or intelligible basis, and the memorandum of understanding did not cure the defect. Execution was therefore refused and the execution application dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309252