<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 285 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33680</link>
    <description>Under the compounded levy scheme for hot re-rolling mills, temporary non-functioning of one machine part at inspection did not justify re-determination of annual capacity because there was no change in the installed machinery or reliable material showing altered installed capacity. However, where the formula-based capacity under the Capacity Determination Rules was lower than the assessee&#039;s admitted actual production for the preceding year, the annual capacity had to be taken at the higher admitted figure. Duty liability was therefore fixed on the annual capacity so determined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 285 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33680</link>
      <description>Under the compounded levy scheme for hot re-rolling mills, temporary non-functioning of one machine part at inspection did not justify re-determination of annual capacity because there was no change in the installed machinery or reliable material showing altered installed capacity. However, where the formula-based capacity under the Capacity Determination Rules was lower than the assessee&#039;s admitted actual production for the preceding year, the annual capacity had to be taken at the higher admitted figure. Duty liability was therefore fixed on the annual capacity so determined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>