<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 882 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the deletion of the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D as no exempt income was received. However, the disallowance of depreciation on intellectual property rights was upheld as the Authorized Representative chose not to press this ground. The judgment was pronounced on 17/08/2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 882 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the deletion of the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D as no exempt income was received. However, the disallowance of depreciation on intellectual property rights was upheld as the Authorized Representative chose not to press this ground. The judgment was pronounced on 17/08/2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>