<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Firm Responsible for Taxes on Income Declared Under IDS 2016, Not Individual Partner&#039;s Responsibility.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71550</link>
    <description>Cash credit u/s 68 - assessee is a partner has declared income under IDS 2016 but the declaration failed as the taxes due on income declared was not paid by the firm - the income belonging to the firm whether disclosed or undisclosed can be taxed only in the hands of the firm and not in the hands of the partner. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:14:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2023 12:21:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Firm Responsible for Taxes on Income Declared Under IDS 2016, Not Individual Partner&#039;s Responsibility.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71550</link>
      <description>Cash credit u/s 68 - assessee is a partner has declared income under IDS 2016 but the declaration failed as the taxes due on income declared was not paid by the firm - the income belonging to the firm whether disclosed or undisclosed can be taxed only in the hands of the firm and not in the hands of the partner. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:14:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>