<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 855 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441876</link>
    <description>Denial of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Disputes Resolution) Scheme benefits for non-credit of the quantified amount within time was unjustified where the assessee had validly opted into the scheme, the declaration had been accepted, and repeated bona fide payment attempts failed because of banking and server-related technical glitches beyond the assessee&#039;s control. The court treated timely diligence and sufficient available funds as decisive, and set aside rejection of the claim for want of timely payment. Interest at 13% per annum was directed on the quantified amount within the time fixed, after which the dispute would stand settled under the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 855 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441876</link>
      <description>Denial of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Disputes Resolution) Scheme benefits for non-credit of the quantified amount within time was unjustified where the assessee had validly opted into the scheme, the declaration had been accepted, and repeated bona fide payment attempts failed because of banking and server-related technical glitches beyond the assessee&#039;s control. The court treated timely diligence and sufficient available funds as decisive, and set aside rejection of the claim for want of timely payment. Interest at 13% per annum was directed on the quantified amount within the time fixed, after which the dispute would stand settled under the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>