<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 143 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33674</link>
    <description>The court held in favor of the Revenue, stating that the credit balance in the post-warranty service scheme was deemed as income for the dealer. The court emphasized that the absence of a transfer to the profit and loss account did not alter the tax liability. Any unclaimed amounts had to be treated as income after a specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 143 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33674</link>
      <description>The court held in favor of the Revenue, stating that the credit balance in the post-warranty service scheme was deemed as income for the dealer. The court emphasized that the absence of a transfer to the profit and loss account did not alter the tax liability. Any unclaimed amounts had to be treated as income after a specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>