https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309229 Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 operates as a limited enforcement mechanism, and the legal fiction of treating an award as a decree cannot be extended to invoke Section 47 CPC or Order 21 Rules 97 to 101 CPC to attack the award itself at the execution stage. Collateral objections aimed at annulling the arbitral award were therefore held not maintainable. A challenge to a civil court order between private parties, although framed under Article 226, could be entertained only within supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, since certiorari does not lie against such judicial orders. The supervisory challenge consequently failed because no jurisdictional or legal error was shown in refusing the objections. en-us Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Aug 2023 18:30:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309229 Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 operates as a limited enforcement mechanism, and the legal fiction of treating an award as a decree cannot be extended to invoke Section 47 CPC or Order 21 Rules 97 to 101 CPC to attack the award itself at the execution stage. Collateral objections aimed at annulling the arbitral award were therefore held not maintainable. A challenge to a civil court order between private parties, although framed under Article 226, could be entertained only within supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, since certiorari does not lie against such judicial orders. The supervisory challenge consequently failed because no jurisdictional or legal error was shown in refusing the objections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309229