https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309232 The Supreme Court refused to condone a 324-day delay in filing a review petition because no satisfactory explanation was offered, and dismissed the petition on that ground. Independently, the Court also examined the substantive grounds and found no matter warranting interference, so the review petition failed on merits as well. The result was dismissal both for unexplained inordinate delay and for lack of merit. en-us Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2026 11:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309232 The Supreme Court refused to condone a 324-day delay in filing a review petition because no satisfactory explanation was offered, and dismissed the petition on that ground. Independently, the Court also examined the substantive grounds and found no matter warranting interference, so the review petition failed on merits as well. The result was dismissal both for unexplained inordinate delay and for lack of merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309232