<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 261 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33670</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the business was set up on the date of placing the purchase order in July 1994, allowing the assessee to claim expenses as revenue expenditure. The Court distinguished between setting up and commencement of a business, deeming expenses incurred before commencement as deductible. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, dismissing both the Revenue&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 261 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33670</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the business was set up on the date of placing the purchase order in July 1994, allowing the assessee to claim expenses as revenue expenditure. The Court distinguished between setting up and commencement of a business, deeming expenses incurred before commencement as deductible. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, dismissing both the Revenue&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>