<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Overturned Confiscation u/s 130 Raises Questions About GST Determination; Impacts Sections 67 and 74 Proceedings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71537</link>
    <description>Validity of determination of Tax / GST when the Confiscation of goods u/s 130 was set aside - While proceedings u/s 67 and Section 74 are distinct in scope and purpose, at the same time, the essential facts found non-existent in the proceedings under Section 67 would have a material bearing on proceedings under Section 74 of the Act drawn up on the same basis. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:47:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Overturned Confiscation u/s 130 Raises Questions About GST Determination; Impacts Sections 67 and 74 Proceedings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71537</link>
      <description>Validity of determination of Tax / GST when the Confiscation of goods u/s 130 was set aside - While proceedings u/s 67 and Section 74 are distinct in scope and purpose, at the same time, the essential facts found non-existent in the proceedings under Section 67 would have a material bearing on proceedings under Section 74 of the Act drawn up on the same basis. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:47:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>