<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 830 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441851</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the impugned order dated 31.03.2022, citing procedural irregularities, contradictions, and violations of natural justice principles. The writ petition was allowed, and costs were imposed on the respondent, payable to the Allahabad HC Legal Services Committee. The respondents must recover the cost from the responsible officer, with compliance verification scheduled in three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 830 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441851</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the impugned order dated 31.03.2022, citing procedural irregularities, contradictions, and violations of natural justice principles. The writ petition was allowed, and costs were imposed on the respondent, payable to the Allahabad HC Legal Services Committee. The respondents must recover the cost from the responsible officer, with compliance verification scheduled in three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>